Monday, 18 January 2016

Son - be an unabashed admirer of America, but always remain truly in romance with India

Son,

You are going to the US for your education just like your grandfather, and me! 

It takes me back to the day I left for America to study. Looking back, some things feel unchanged while others have changed completely.

I read a joke recently: a Cuban, a Russian, an American and an Indian met on the upper deck of a ship and began to show off. The Cuban threw away an expensive cigar after one puff and said, “No problem, plenty of cigars in my country.” The Russian tossed a bottle of vodka after one sip and said, “No problem, plenty of vodka in my country.” The American, at a loss for something to boast about, said, “Plenty of Indians in my country,” and pushed the Indian overboard. ;-) 

Plenty of Indians!

Indians are now everywhere in the USA, and far from being pushed out, they have entered the mainstream as professors, CEOs, entrepreneurs, senators, presidential candidates, even Hollywood stars!

Though only about 1.5% of the U.S. population, Indian-Americans have become a model immigrant community.

They show stable family structures, low rates of violent crime, and comparatively negligible psychological problems. As a result, they’re producing national spelling bee champions and among those aged 25 and older, about 75% hold a bachelor’s degree or higher, versus roughly 35% nationally. They hold about 10% of U.S. patents and a striking share of successful start-ups, including unicorns. Their median household income tops over every other group at over USD 150,000, and they contribute nearly 6% of U.S. taxes.

In my day we had none of that. 

In Iowa, where I spent my freshman year, I was the first Indian anyone there had met. An inquisitive woman asked whether I was “a white guy with a great tan or a black guy with straight hair!”

What hasn’t changed is how, as an Indian teenager, I longed to imitate those “cool Americans.” Nike shoes, Coca-Cola, video games, Wrigley gum, dancing at discos, and visiting Disneyland and Hollywood all captured my imagination. That was, and to a large extent still is - the soft power of America.

For India’s sake, I want you to explore that soft power while you’re there. Ask: how does a country attract so many people for so long? 

What is its secret sauce?

Harvard’s Dr. Joseph Nye defines soft power as the intangible appeal that attracts others and can change their behavior. A teen adopting American jeans, food, music, or accent to seem “cool” is a simple example of soft power. Unlike sticks or carrots, soft power is inexpensive and effective long-term.

Dr. Nye says a nation’s soft power grows when:

1) Its dominant culture aligns with global trends (democracy, open trade, fair judiciary, women’s empowerment, pluralism).

2) Its grand culture is clearly communicated.

3) It delivers visible results that uplift citizens.

Ideas whose time has come cannot be stopped by armies. I believe India’s time has come. When you’re in the U.S., be an ambassador for India. 

When people ask about our country, speak of things that matter - the traits that are distinctly Indian.

Shashi Tharoor’s Pax Indica notes we rank high: GDP by PPP, growth rates, army size, nuclear and space programs, IT, entertainment, and media. 

But tangibles aren’t everything. As Einstein said, not everything that counts can be counted.

Our soft power is this: despite many cultures, languages, and religions pulling in different directions, we still function as one nation. At the time of independence, even when Pakistan partitioned away, barring a few, we stitched together 560 princely states without a battle to form the Union of India, something unique in the world. That unity has let us punch above our economic weight. If the world doesn’t fully appreciate the tiger's earned stripes, it’s because they're preoccupied in their preconceived notions. 

It is time we tell our story effectively.

We are also the wise elephant!

After Independence, we didn’t nurse grudges against the British; we forged trade ties. Unlike Pakistan, which defined itself in opposition of India, India remained a culturally secular and democratic republic. Our DNA is accommodating. 

When the US president George W. Bush introduced Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to his wife, he reportedly noted that India remained free of Al-Qaeda despite having over 150 million Muslims - a comment meant to highlight our pluralism.

We work with friends like Israel in agriculture and defense, yet we vote our conscience at the UN when we disagree on Palestine. 

That is so even when many Muslim nations vote unfairly on Kashmir, yet we decide on merits, not expedience. We also have no history of anti-Semitism but have in fact given refuge to some Jews when they were escaping Hitler reign. 

During the Cold War we stayed nonaligned. We shifted slightly after the US supported Pakistan’s attack on India but we still kept our sovereign choices open, seeking security arrangements from the Soviets and trade with the U.S. Our politicians visited Moscow, our business community went to New York.

We stayed largely self-reliant, so that sanctions don't work on India. After Pokhran, U.S. sanctions came and went because they discovered they had more to lose. Over time, without signing the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), we convinced the world to accept our nuclear program and cooperate with us. We adopted a “No First Use” stance and stuck to it.

That resolve was tested after Kargil, when Pakistan’s military misadventure strained relations. Even then, India offered peace and invited their leader Musharraf later to the Agra Summit - we choose peace when possible. 

In the Gulf war, India stayed out of the US lead coalition and pushed for talks. Today, after the global pockets of skirmishes and wars, such restraint looks prescient.

We have not annexed any neighbors. Bhutan has remained independent and close to India by choice. Tibet’s monks have seen India as refuge; we have supported them out of kindness rather than political gain. Our aid to Afghan refugees and reconstruction is another example.

At the WTO we stood against the world to defend our food-security needs and the right to stockpile foodgrain in case of monsoon failure. We asserted our priorities and ultimately attracted India-centric investment because strength commands respect.

Prime Minister Modi’s visits to Washington & Moscow, Tehran & Riyadh, Jerusalem & Ramallah - all warring with each other by hot or cold, still warmly received him, shows how India can engage diverse partners. 

Some call India a “soft state,” but I see a sovereign nation that decides independently for the long term and often chooses humanity over politics. India has therefore been recognized as the first responder nation in case of any natural calamity in any part of the world. 

Christopher Columbus searched for India but found America. Like your grandfather, I went to America drawn by its soft power, and from afar, rediscovered what India means to me.

Once away, the things I’d taken for granted became precious: masala chai, masaledar snacks, the street vendors’ cries. 

America felt comfortable, like a supermarket. India felt like home - a wonderfully chaotic, bubbling bazaar.

Education should be rooted in culture and wedded to growth. The country that nourished your roots will strengthen your future. As you spread branches, remember: deeper roots yield sweeter fruits. 

While you’ll be America’s student, remain a soldier of India and be there with a learner's curiosity. 

Be an unabashed admirer of America, but stay forever in love with India.

All the very best.

Love,
Dadzi Pop

Monday, 11 January 2016

Of facts, fiction, frogz & fun !


@ Home

Before I had gone soft spoken in voice, I recall it had gotten hoarse & that's when my tale had begun. 

I recall vividly, my wife had given me that look & said in that all too infamous old wives' tone "You're not like before".

Oh-o now what? - I had thought.

I had raced my mind to figure out my next old husbands' move. As a response, should I put on that 'Hey, what  are you talking about?' child-like innocent look OR should I just confess?

Well, eventually I'll anyway be found out- I recall I had concluded.

I had decided to own up.

Boys aspire to look like their dads but that day, I had reversed the order, just to borrow my sons innocent looking face.

I had taken a deep breath, shut my eyes & opened my mouth to tell it all with a : "Ahm...actually....er...you know...I umm ...no honey I umn". Hen pecked that I was, I had found myself completely speechless.

Before my 2nd attempt, my son had interjected "Yes dad you are not like before - your voice sounds like a croaking frog" !

FROG? I had pondered with an inverted-u-smile.

Phew, anyway topic had got changed .....or had it?

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale. 

@ Work

You all well knew that slowly my voice had gone from croaking like a frog, to that sound of a teenaged tadpole.

And so since over a month, each of you had been escaping my screaming & shouting - no matter how much indiscipline you had put on display.

As if that was not enough, I had been further troubled by the fact that when some of you came to my office & I spoke softly to you, you also had respond back to me softly.

Why?

I had wondered if you were also having a problem with your vocal chords or was mine a contagious disease or to add insult to injury - you were making fun of me by imitating me. To add ouch to my agony, when I was in excruciating pain & couldn't even speak softly, I was compelled to just whisper. The response I had got was a soft counter whisper - forcing me to ask "What...what?". 

I had suspected that maybe I also had an ear problem.

When I used to write on a note pad, your answers were also in writing - just because your handwriting is better than mine eh?

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale.

@ Doctor's

I had gone for a check-up & had told the doc my problem in a very faint voice. He, in an equally whispery soft voice had responded back "You can't speak?". 

No kidding! I remember, I was fuming at being made fun of by this so called noble profession guy.

Sensing that I was getting upset, my wife had taken over and she had explained my 'case of the disappearing voice'. I think he looked a wee bit extra delighted as she had narrated the events.

The doctor had eventually understood that I was a patient loosing patience.

Finally, he had began his business with his standard operating procedure.

"Any history of blood pressure or diabetes or heart problem?" he had asked without any emotions of sympathy. I recall I had shook my head into a no-no-no, as I had remembered Akbar, Chandragupta Maurya & Mrs. Sita Kumar my history teacher in school.

Then after the expected "aye, ee, ii, oo, uu, ... ahhh" that the doctor had made me do with my tongue completely out ( pls try it right now - it's fun ) he had looked at the nurse from Kerela and used big big medical words. I knew about these nurses from south of India, I was told they believe that - doing service to mankind is doing service to God. I had indeed felt safe as she had nodded an Indian nod ( shaking head side to side-wala ). But then the Doc had looked at me and uttered the the great grandfather of big words that made me feel unsafe - "We need to do a nasolaryngo-scopy on you".

I had also nodded without any understanding, resembling that nurse and turning instantly Hindu, as they have 86 lakh ( +/- 10% ) Gods & I had prayed to all of them at once. I waz as half scared as half excited :

Scared as that grandpa of a big word had just confirmed to me that - invoice to recover a lost voice, would be huge  :-(

The exciting part was, maybe once this 'Go Larry's-nose go' thing was done, we could put that in our company profile, in the 'Management Leadership' section under my name as a qualification passed :-)

He had then asked me to lie down on the couch & had dropped a few drops into my nose. I recall well that I was tickled & spooked - "Problem is in my throat sir, not nose" I had said loudly, almost. The doctor had got startled at the sudden awaking of my voice and had shhhh-ed me into a silence. After a few seconds, I had felt that I was not breathing at all and was bewildered as to how I was still alive?

To confirm, I had asked.

The Doc had ignored me; the kind God's nurse had explained that he had just administered local anesthesia & as the drops trickled down my nose and reached my throat, they left behind a trail of numbness. Dumbness I had thought - at least he should inform me before doing this to me. Indian Doc that he was, his eloquence was in his stern silence.

Anyway, he had then pulled out a tube camera to insert into my left nostril.

I remember, I had posed.

He had slowly pushed it in, much to my horror ( though I was not embarrassed, there were no road blocks ) and slowly the tube must have reached my voice box, deep in my throat. After about 20 second he had removed the tube and watched the movie that he had recorded ... sans any popcorn.

At least he had finally found his voice again "Ahhh" he had exclaimed. Not fair, I thought ... he had taken a short cut to good luck, as he had skipped the other vowels that he had made me utter.

"There is a problem" the pleased Doc had said. He then had explained to me at length without big words but had still managed to scare me "Imagine a two door window. To shut it tight, we must close both the doors. However in monsoon, sometimes we experience that the wood gets swollen and then the window does not shut but remains ajar. Same has happened to your vocal chords that act like the two doors of a window; one of them is swollen for some reason". 

I had reasoned myself to never keep my mouth open in any future monsoons.

He had said that he could laser-cut my swelling and fit it all back to size. I was scared of operations, so I had asked him if he knew of any alternative methods. 

Bewildered the Doc had asked "Like what"?

My turn. I had happily dispensed advise to the doctor "You know no cutting fitting, why not do like just how those tantric fellows do - they make the patient chant some chants & its sorted"

"Chant" the angry Doc had said in a loud voice ( much to my jealousy ) & had continued "No tantric, the only trick - is to shut up ... & be that way as much as possible" as he had walked out of the room.

I had promised myself to never see him again. Well destiny had other plans for me. 

Nevertheless, I had left from there. ..quietly of course.

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale.

@ Being silenced
During that frustratingly quiet period of no talking, by chance, I met myself a bit more intimately. I had actually realized what it was to be a handicap - sure makes me a more sensitive person now.

When in a group, I am regularly that guy that rants at the top of hiz voice, seeking and soaking in disproportionate attention.

But due to my forced silence, I had actually begun to wait for an accidental eye contact with someone to signal my message, as I was being ignored in a group. Alternatively, I would take advantage of that sudden and unplanned momentary hush that tends to just happen every once in a while between humans in conversation. That pregnant pause, that occurs between talks for no apparent reason, would make a 'normal' persons feel a bit awkward, but to me, it was 'my moment' to grab & whisper out a short message in between.

In a world where 'survival of the fittest' is a mantra, it must be heart wrenching for some, to be just a mute spectators.

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale.
 

@ The dead of the night

Well, I had then learned of a freak advantage in that indisposed state.

In agony & unable to take it any longer, I had gone to the same doctor's late one night. Surprisingly, hiz wife saw me from the window, I had inquired in the softest of voice "Is the doctor home?"

She it seems had taken me a wee bit too seriously. She excitedly looked around to see if any of the neighbors were watching. On confirmation that none were, in a hush hush voice had replied with a mischief in one eye & a wink in the other, as if to beckon me invitingly inside her abode & said with a smile "No he is not" !

Just then, the doctor had returned home ....damn.

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale.

 @ God knows where

I came, I saw & they put me to sleep.

I was in a timeless zone. However, I could still see them all peering over me. They were examining me. They would touch me but I could not feel them.

Some looking at me in awe and some thought me to be awful. Some nervous, some pretending to not be and yet some genuinely interested. Some were fearful of me. However, I felt no glee nor glum, no emotions at all. Just then someone got out a dissection blade. 

I woke up, I saw and I came to my senses.

Anyway, I had lived to tell a another tale.

@ Being me again

What? ...I was not a frog in a bio lab being examined by students ! I am a patient just operated upon for my vocal chord nodules. My general anesthesia had just worn off.

I could still see them all peering over me, they were doctors; including my favorite one !

It was 15th Nov 2014. The operation had gone off well, thank you.

I had instantly realized that I shall soon be able to speak normally once again i.e. humanly ... until my darling gives me that next dose, in that old wives' tone & makes me speechless again !

Monday, 4 January 2016

Bolo Bharat Mata Ki Jai Indeed !



It is said that - 'If there is anything ever true about India, its opposite is also true'. Thus, India with it's vagaries and complexities & over the years bloated bureaucracy, is a very difficult country to govern. Yet within just 18 months under Narendra Modi, things have changed for the better. 

India is supposed to be a thriving democracy & yet like in a monarchy, most of the political parties that operate here are like family owned private limited enterprises. On assuming power, one of the 1st thing that Mr. Modi had done or rather undone was, he disallowed for more than one family member from holding a position of power in his government.

Before I give my assessment on Mr. Modi, it would be appropriate for me to tell you a bit on the kind of world that we live in.

The 5 things that are undoing the global order & society at large are: 

1) De-globalization i.e. due to the global recession, once again the self-centric trade agreements, imposition of non-tariff barriers and political & ideological alignments among nations is undermining institutions like WTO, UN & even the relatively newly formed G20.

2) Partisan political stalemate & acrimony is preventing even basic progress in many Democratic nations. 

3) Innovation in finance & monetary policy like Quantitative Easing in developed nations & artificially kept low interest rates, brings with it an expected long term volatility in the markets. 

4) China is slowly becoming a leader with no followers, rise of the ISIS brand of terrorism & it's asymmetrical ways of war and the American political fatigue gives no real direction to the community of nations. 

5) Last & the loudest - aggressive media, including social media today allows fastest distribution of misinformation & wrong influence and so compounds some of the above issues even more. Media, supposedly the 4th pillar of Democracy is severely compromised. Today it no longer reports, it takes sides. Let us understand this, it has transmuted into a profit making business, hence doesn’t deserve nobility. The "No news is good news" axiom was never more appropriate, than now.

Now coming back to Mr. Modi, for his supporters, I think - Mr. Modi is more of a metaphor for 'change' than a person.

As a student of leaders, I can say with conviction that Mr. Modi has made himself the national agenda, an entire government has been personified & rechristened after him i.e. now dubbed as Modi Sarkar. He still attracts the Indian diaspora crowds in different corners of the world, inspiring & energizing them to not only receive him with an unprecedented pomp & also spontaneously erupting into a ‘Modi-Modi’ chant in chorus.

All this, even when he belongs to the "lowest pedigree" i.e. is a politician vs. being a star in the field of sports, cinema or music. Mr. Modi is a rock star !

Suddenly India has arrived on the world stage & now every world leader is found to be accommodating to Mr. Modi's agenda !

His rise is half the story, where he started from, gives the true picture & I am not even talking of the fact that he is the son of road-side tea seller.

His vilification by the Indian media, including by reputed international & otherwise sanguine sounding magazines like The Economist, who did not endorse him - had an unprecedented impact. They painted Mr. Modi as an Islamophobic individual & that even influenced the mighty America - who wrongly banned an elected representative, untried in any court, the Chief Minister of an important state of India from entering into America ( for the record, Mr. Modi is now found cent percent innocent ). The national & regional parties that were traditionally opposed to each other, had singled him out & had launched a united front against this man.

Today the Modi-man is on the top of the world & screaming - Bharat Mata Ki Jai.

As if being led by the conductor of an orchestra - the rating agencies, the IMF & World Bank are all echoing his words in unison. They are viewing India as an upward moving nation. Obama penned a note on the Modi-man, in the world famous TIME magazine.

Till 2008, 114 nations were growing at a rate of 5% plus, today less than a one handful are. With such strong head winds, India turning around as a country with the highest large-nation growth rate, is a miracle in itself.

GDP growth which was retarding for last 5 years & is now moving in the opposite direction - inflation is tamed, including on non-oil dependent items; fiscal deficit is brought under control; forex reserves have risen to an all time high & balance of payment situation is comfortable; unlike most currencies that have tumbled against the American dollar, the Indian rupee has relatively held ground; natural assets are being sold through auction in the most transparent manner & are fetching higher than expected revenue; there is direct transfer of cash to the account of the qualified poor; e-Governance is finally taking shape to reduce procedures, hurdles & middle men; and among other things, corruption as a national menace, has been dealt with a severe blow !

There is an expectation from the Modi-fied government & managing that can be a deemed 'problem of the plenty'. However, contrast that with the fact that, till recently, most felt that they must attempt to grow in spite of & not because of the government.

It is sad that the media is focusing more of what is yet to be done, rather than the wonderful work in progress. The focus of the media is also so naive.

Are the foreign trips' duration important or what he achieved in those trips more important?  Besides huge FDI investment line up, MOUs for unfettered uranium supply, technology to make fighter planes & nuclear reactor in India are just some of the achievements that Mr. Modi made. In fact, he has done more than what any expert commentator had predicted before the trip & still remains absolutely unpredictable - his suddenly landing in Pakistan to wish the PM there on his birthday, being the latest coup.

The media accuses Mr. Modi of being a one-man-band who chokes his ministers. In the UPAs scam era, we had so many self-appointed PMs that called their own shots in contempt of the PMO and the real PM himself was one remote controlled mute spectator. Now when I listen to the likes of say, Rajnath Singh, Arun Jaitley, Suresh Prabhu, Venkaiah Naidu, Piyush Goyal, Smriti Irani, Ravi Shankar Prasad, etc, they talk of Mr. Modi with so much reverence - I wonder on the media's motive. 

While business balance sheets were already too stressed from past era's permission pains & delays & so many projects are stalled. Banks are not in a position to lend them more due to past defaults. Here too, the government is trying to resolve the issues. Mr. Modi's handicap is that he does not have the numbers in the Rajya Sabha to pass bills & Congress has fallen so low, that it has nothing to lose. It has coalesced with former enemies to block the most essential GST & Land Acquisition bills, both required for new jobs to go on the ground & foreign investments to go off the ground. The same too shall be resolved as such unity among opposition members for a poor cause seldom lasts.

Finally, contrary to the RaGa-baba's claim & backed by media created perception that it's a "suit boot ki sarkar"; the cash rich business houses, are learning to go through the slow but sure due diligence process by this regime, as under table "speed money" is becoming worthless.

Have faith, be patient - India under Mr. Modi will do you proud. Not one or two years, Modi Sarkar is working for the next decade.

BTW, not withstanding the media's adulterated agenda, Mr. Modi is still among the most popular world leaders and according to a recent survey, he enjoys over 70 % popular rating within India.

Bolo Bharat Mata Ki Jai Indeed !

Friday, 4 December 2015

O Nari Tu Narayani!

Once upon a time, there was a so-called 'unsinkable' ship called the Titanic.

Alas, it was found to be sinking!

To make matters worse, there were too many people on board and too few lifeboats.

The men in charge pulled out their guns and screamed an order: "Women and children only!"

That was not about flirting, holding doors, or pulling chairs - it was about who lives and who dies.

It meant that the men holding life-taking guns would go down with the Titanic into icy watery graves, and the unarmed women would live on.

This was not the decision of one individual, but of an entire group of men. It was not out of helplessness; there was a choice. It was not sudden; there was time to change their minds.

And yet, it was executed as planned, and most men did die.

Till the very end, even in the face of certain and imminent death, the chaos was far below what one would expect. Most men remained disciplined in death.

You may already know all of this.

What you may not know is that among the men on the Titanic was a Japanese man named Masabumi Hosono.

He somehow escaped, dressed as a woman.

Hosono was employed by the government of Japan. When they found out, they fired him for taking away a lady's seat in the lifeboat, thereby bringing death to some unknown woman left behind, and disgrace to Japan.

That was not all. His name made it into school textbooks, and children were taught how not to be like him!

In most cultures, across geographies, women and children have typically been kept away from the harm's way.

Not necessarily because she is physically weak, but to borrow the movie caption: "There's something about Mary" that makes her special.

A man is more - in fact, is a gentleman, putting on his best manners in the presence of a woman.

Unless men are fighting each other over her - tongue firmly in cheek!

A man's principled duty is to protect her.

Why?

Because across cultures, she is the first nurturer of the family and the moral guardian. 

And the man?

Across cultures, he is the first protector cum provider and always wanting to save his family while expanding his territory.

What feeds his sense of well-being vis-a-vis other men is either his higher wisdom, strength, or prosperity.

These are the three key parameters by which he compares and competes with fellow men.

In the Hindu-centric culture, the sources of his wisdom, strength, and prosperity are the Goddesses Saraswati, Shakti, and Lakshmi, respectively.

That the high and mighty bow to these feminine deities with no hesitation whatsoever is Indianness at its core.

Anyone who says men and women are equal hasn't understood women. He is the mighty, but sinkable Titanic. She is his mariner's compass, showing him his North.

A lady is not just a non-male. She is distinctly unique.

Oh woman, oh woman, you are a labyrinth of complexities, an intriguing tapestry, a mystery.

And if she becomes him, what uniqueness does she then have?

The patriarchy debate in India, led by the feminist, as it is framed today, is largely an imported ideological lens. 

The feminist movement was much needed in America to fight patriarchy as in their earlier theological culture, they believed that the creator made the man first and then later the woman from his side - to help him in his premier roles. 

Forget leaders, they didn't accept woman as a valid voter for over a century after the first modern election when only the elite white men voted in America!

That's not exploitation, it's even worse - discrimination. 

So, we must go by our civilizational context, experiences, and culture. 

Here, we have Goddesses in our faith, females as heroes in our history, iconic freedom fighters, and other role models in our culture. 

The imported arguments of today does more to obfuscate and divide the society than to explain it.

Sure, there are wretched people out there - men and women, who exploit others for personal gain. Some rich exploit the poor, the powerful the the powerless, the privileged the underprivileged, etc. 

However, it has nothing to do with just men. 

Division of labor and responsibility between the sexes has existed everywhere, from advanced societies to the most primitive tribes across the world. 

If one may, it is an anthropological observation - a functional reality, not a timeless global conspiracy. However, de-glamourisation of traditional roles of women, is a Western import. 

And so, the family, a unit building block of society, is strong here, but weak there. 

In India, we have traditionally celebrated both femininity and feminism.

The distinction that comes to the fore is that the former is about being at ease with one's intrinsic gender based nature and the roles that flow from it, while the latter is about the extrinsic role that evolves with demand of circumstances, be it that of a caring mother or a daring warrior - like Rani Lakshmibai or Goddess Durga herself.

One can oscillate between the two.

What should not happen is force-fitting a young lady into an ideology that is not naturally her's, else be deemed incomplete, which a "modern" feminist often does. She must be encouraged to decide for herself and do whatever she likes,  while being mindful of her psychological and physiological parameters which differ from person to person. 

Viewing women empowerment from a Western lens is coloniality. 

A woman who has made herself wholly equal to a man is, by definition, stripped of femininity, and thus, utterly subjugated!

No man will sacrifice life to save her in the next sinking Titanic. 

Bolo Bharat Mata Ki ... Jai Okay Please 🙌🏽🇮🇳


Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Learning 101

Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Bill Gates of Microsoft, and Steve Jobs of Apple have taken over our lives. And how!

All three have no college degrees to boast of.

I find it amusing that parents of young children fret so much about the education curriculum even in primary school, and start worrying about college for the grown-ups of the future.

If education alone could transform ordinary people into greats, then a few wealthy families with access to the best institutions and teachers would have continued to rule over us for generations.

If you think the products of these geniuses became ubiquitous because of technology, you are wrong.

Their power comes more from cutting-edge insights into human behaviour and less from cutting-edge technology. The latter is just a tool.

The billionaires who make it to that coveted Forbes list are self-made, first-generation entrepreneurs, and many have no college degree. The numbers for movie stars, sports champions, and politicians holding a college degree are even lower.

We can say then with some authority that the belief in ‘success-through-education,’ at least in the classroom-teaching model - is futile.

I think an educational institution is fantastic if it allows a student to go through the right experiences: facing, succumbing to, and then rising from all sorts of peer pressures and their associated pokes, pinches, pulls, and pushes.

No education should be without a mild version of bullying and standing up to the bully.

What matters in life is the development of emotional stamina, contextual cleverness, and synthesizing skills - the capacity to grasp the situation and then to fight, flee, or fudge in between.

A mark of leaders is that they step up to take decisions when the crowd is fumbling in doubt.

Real-life hard decisions, whether tactical or strategic, don't come from textbooks. They often have to be taken with the situation in mind, where correctness is not as important as appropriateness, if one may say so.

All this, in the midst of friends, foes, and politicians who are inescapable in our daily lives.

Finally, no institution can give a child what nature has withheld. At best, it can only set an ill-set but already formed diamond.

I am more than convinced that exam scores have almost no real role to play in a child's development. In fact, they often play a negative one. At some level, the following happens:

* The child is gloomed if grades are bad, as it depresses the child.

* The child is doomed if grades are good, because the child then gets a wrong notion of self-worth.

One can be educated but still not learned. Education is simply an advantage, not a solution.

It is time we understood that a college degree is definitely not a certification of a higher level of thinking.

It is the right experiences that ripen knowledge into wisdom. And most wisdom is of, by, for, and from the people.

At the end of it, humans by nature are gregarious, and it is only people who give us the most pain and pleasure. A child needs people practice. Thus, it is still essential to go to school and college, because it is the cheapest way to bring about a long-term congregation of young people - nothing else exists, so that good, bad, and mad experiences are most likely to occur. A simulation lab, if you will.

Don't get me wrong. It is good to hang a well-laminated college degree certificate on the wall. With the advent of cell phones, wall calendars are outdated, so a fancy degree makes a good fill-in-the-blank item ;-)

Please take the above with a pinch of salt!

Tuesday, 1 December 2015

Less freedom of speech, please

At the onset, let me clarify that I am not anti-minority of any kind, in fact I belong to one of the smallest minority community in India.  I own a Christian first name, a Muslim last name & but am a non-practicing Jain. 

I come from a very broad minded family, with Indian-ness being central to our family ethos.

I refer to the "intolerance debate" & insinuation that the freedom of speech is being curbed by the Modi Sarkar. 

As a counter, I assert that the liberal Indian media is anti-Hindu as claimed by some:

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/bloody-mary/no-the-liberal-indian-is-not-pro-muslim-and-anti-hindu/
Well nothing can be further from the truth & the so called liberal creed who are in control of popular media, are as anti-Hindu as anti-Modi as anti-India.

Your game is up media. It is well known that very conveniently, you touch upon actual facts in your e-version, as same is in open domain. In print media however, since foreign media dailies cannot operate in India, you are taking advantage of the same & attempting to manipulate national opinions with only half truths or putting the truth in the inside pages.

You too should learn to exercise restraint & not spread news beyond its expected importance or utility. The media is seen cherry picking communally incite-full news; instead it must change its focus on bringing out more positive insightful views. There are many good things happening in this wonderful country. And not all politicians are dumb, lazy or corrupt - do debate policies & show genuine recognition where due.

Also please be aware that most Hindus are not extreme right wingers nor are most Indian men rapists as you make Indians to be. 

Your constant bombardment of stray incidents, in all papers & TV news channels which btw surprisingly scream in unison & chorus (copycat journalism?) on exact same topic at the exact same time has come to become a suspect of trying to apply the Joseph Goebbels' law : "If you tell a lie big enough & constantly repeat it, people will eventually come to believe it".

Ingluenced by you, the foreign media, including that of the West are portraying India as a nation run by male chauvinist Hindu fundamentalist, and portraying Indian men as soaking in lust & a nation on the brink of a communal divide. 

They regularly hold media trials and even mention that of RSS at the UN, without an iota of understanding of what the organization stands for. 

Earlier, when the Indian media had gone overboard in reporting rape incidents, a German university had got influenced & denied Indian male students admission there.

As far as the Indian citizens go, most of us have lost faith in the Indian media.

Now coming back to the various articles surrounding the Dadri incident, for argument's sake, let's agree that the Dadri's Muslim man's killing waz indeed an act of murder in cold blood, while that of the Bajrangdal Hindu activist in Karnataka was a political gang war. Let us also agree that the former deserves more media attention than the latter.

The moot question is, how much more attention? The almost 3 weeks of reportage for the first one & absolutely no mention at all for the other one? 

The urban left leaning liberal media was compelled to talk of the Karnataka killing only after they were trounced in the Twitter world.

The media created "PM's shocking silence" after every incident haz come to haunt you now & it's your turn - people are demanding that you not remain so shockingly tongue tied each time a Hindu person is killed by any minority, else you will make most neutral persons become right wing cheerleaders. And speak if you must, then let it be balanced reportage.

Also understand that the PM is not expected to comment on every state issues (the elected Chief Minister of State may) else his stated developmental agenda will get sidelined or overloaded, as folks will demand a statement every now & then. Your bias is anyway visible as you never ever print on 1st page or debate on TV on what the PM does, speaks on governance. You have also conveniently stopped understanding figure of speech or metaphors and are putting word for direct meaning, instead of focusing on the spirit behind the words when it comes to BJP leaders - Modi's puppy remark & VK Singh's dog remarks are examples of lopsided "presstituting", if I may.

Now let me make my case. You also forgot to showcase or debate the following:



# Even when the PM alluded in favor of Islam, you ignored the statesman. The words "Islamic Terrorism" had become common place. You failed to highlight that it was PM Modi who pushed & compelled the world at the East Asia Summit to replace it with simply "Terrorism" so as to not serotype the Muslims nor alienating the vast majority of peaceful Muslims.

We should reject any linkage between religion and terrorism: Narendra Modi tells East Asia Summit



# You lamented the farmer's suicide and did not beat the UPA as hard as you should have for loan waiver of Rs. 70,000 crores and instead hid from all the success of Gujarati farmers, as that would have brought the Gujarat Model on the forefront of debate.
Gujarat’s agri success an eye-opener: Kalam
 


# You made it sound that under Modi, Gujarat was a living hell for the Muslims. Nothing could be further from the truth.  

Recall, the Sachar Committee was formed by the UPA to know about the well-being of Muslims in each state. You failed to highlight the sad plight of Muslims in pseudo-secular non-BJP states.
Muslims prosper in Gujarat and Kerala; UP, Bihar the worst



#
The trial of Sanjiv Bhatt in Supreme Court revealed that the entire post Godhra riot media soap opera, was orchestrated & paid for by foreign NGOs. For a media trial that ran for 12 long years, should the Supreme Court’s revelation not have run for at least 12 days with the most intense debate so that such a travesty of justice does not happen again?  
Supreme Court quashes Sanjiv Bhatt’s plea, says attempt to influence court through politics and activism


# Further, the anti-Modi campaign had run on the premise that Gujarat police were biased against Muslims and gave a free hand to the Hindus to kill the Muslims. The truth is Gujarat police has a great minority representation.  

Gujarat tops states in number of Muslim policemen



# The star witnesses Ms Zaheera Shiekh waz paraded in front of public and prying media's cameras by your liberal brigades when it suited you but the day she confessed that she was tutored, you hid the facts by putting that news in a corner. The court has sent her to jail.

Zaheera will pay for ‘lies’ with 3 months in prison



# The dastardly act of MPs writing to Obama against an elected chief minister Modi was witnessed without disciplinary action by the UPA government of the day & instead they choose to remain mute spectator. It seems that the liberal media had joined the ruling party's chorus of deafening silence, when Modi asked them to speak up. 




# While Wikileaks was well reported by you, the stand taken by the Americans through the NGO fronts was well masked by the traitor media folks:
Obama quietly reverses Hillary’s ‘get Modi’ policy



The media has further said that the average Muslim is falling behind in most social and economic parameters. Good point, but why not debate the why-behind-the-what, rather than show them as the victim?

Ask : Why are the Parsis or Jains or Sikhs or Christians not lagging behind so poorly? Recall the "We shall become the sugar in your milk" story told by Parsi chief when they first arrived in India. Parsis arrived here from foreign land & prospered just like the Hindu-Indian NRIs, or the Hindians do in America.

It happened by imbibing human intuition & not through reliance on any man made institution. The security of any minority is in the goodwill of the majority - that is simple human nature & not India specific. 

The elephant in the room is that most Muslim homes don't push their youth to pursue a more well-rounded or higher education & nor do they nudge them later to go up the corporate ladder. At least not with the same zeal as maybe they would, to remain faithful to the religion. They must also focus on the greats from among their very own.

India has iconic folks from the Muslim faith to boast about, including - a President, Chief Justice, Air Chief Marshal, richest business man of the year, cricket captain, movie stars, music masters, script writers & poets, journalists etc. to name a few.

Wow, like no other country in the world, India has indeed produced so many top most leading folks from the Muslim minority faith - can the Muslim kids not seek inspiration from them?

Not just Muslims, a narrow religion centric identity driven demand by the elders would inevitably render any community inward looking & backward as it would not be capable of assimilating to reap the wealth from a multicultural society. 

If thiz be the media's norm, of focusing on the selective 'what' & not the universal 'why' behind the story, then we can surely do with less freedom of speech. 

Here are the universal truths entwined to robust commonsense. 

1)That faith is a fact beyond the realm of proof or reasoning, and every stakeholder of the nation must accept & respect the same. 

2) That the real security of any minority is not found in the law, but goodwill of the majority. 

3) That the civility of the majority is in its ability to accommodate any minority.

4) That media's freedom is a right, but it's responsibility towards national integrity is paramount and therefore essence of its reportage. 

Sorry liberal media folks - it is only you that is dividing & bringing disrepute to this great nation.